A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity

Authors

  • Manali Shukla Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, ITM University, Gwalior, India
  • Ishika Goyal B.Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, ITM University, Gwalior, India
  • Bhavya Gupta B.Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, ITM University, Gwalior, India
  • Jhanvi Sharma B.Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, ITM University, Gwalior, India

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity AI

Abstract

Generative AI is making buzz all over the globe and has mostly drawn attention due to it's ability to generate variety of content that mimics human behaviour and intelligence along with the ease of access. It comprises of the ability to generate text, images, video, and even audio that are almost unrecognizable from human-created content. Thus there is a huge scope of research in this field due to its vast applicability and motivates this research work. This research work presents comparatively analysis of the three Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool, namely ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity AI, based on the content generation, ownership and developing technology, context understanding, transparency, and information retrieval.

References

E. Kasneci et al., "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education," Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, p. 102274, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

C. K. Lo, "What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature," Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

E. Opara, A. M.-E. Theresa, and T. C. Aduke, "ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges," Glob Acad J Humanit Soc Sci, vol. 5, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001

S. S. Gill and R. Kaur, "ChatGPT: Vision and challenges," Internet Things Cyber-Physical Syst., vol. 3, pp. 262–271, 2023, Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004

A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is All you Need," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3295222.3295349

V. Taecharungroj, "‘What Can ChatGPT Do?’ Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter," Big Data Cogn. Comput., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 35, Feb. 2023,. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035

S. A. Thorat and V. Jadhav, "A Review on Implementation Issues of Rule-based Chatbot Systems," SSRN Electron. J., 2020, Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567047

J. E. Casal and M. Kessler, "Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: a study of research ethics and academic publishing," Res. Methods Appl. Linguist., vol. 2, no. 3, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068

J. Zhao, X. Han, M. Ouyang, and A. F. Burke, "Specialized deep neural networks for battery health prognostics: Opportunities and challenges," J. Energy Chem., vol. 87, pp. 416–438, Dec. 2023, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2023.08.047

A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is All you Need," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. Available from:

https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf

C. Fu et al., "A challenger to gpt-4v? early explorations of gemini in visual expertise," arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12436, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.12436

Y. Wang and Y. Zhao, "Gemini in reasoning: Unveiling commonsense in multimodal large language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17661, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.17661

A. C. Kavak, "ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing, Claude, and Perplexity: Which is the Right AI Tool?," Zeo.org, 2023. Available from: https://zeo.org/resources/blog/chatgpt-google-bard-microsoft-bing-claude-and-perplexity-which-is-the-right-ai-to

F. Somoye, "What is Perplexity AI and what are its uses?," PC Guide, 2023. Available from: https://zapier.com/blog/perplexity-ai/

M. Spencer, "What is Perplexity AI?," Machine Economy Press, 2022. Available from: https://zapier.com/blog/perplexity-ai/

A. Creswell, T. White, V. Dumoulin, K. Arulkumaran, B. Sengupta, and A. A. Bharath, "Generative adversarial networks: An overview," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 53-65, 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.07035

I. J. Goodfellow et al., "Generative adversarial nets," in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014, pp. 2672–2680. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661

W. Cao, X. Wang, Z. Ming, and J. Gao, "A Review on Neural Networks with Random Weights," Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 278-287, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.040

L. Zhang and P. N. Suganthan, "A Survey of Randomized Algorithms for Training Neural Networks," Information Sciences, vol. 364, pp. 146-155, 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.039

S. Wang, T. Z. Huang, J. Liu, and X. G. Lv, "An alternating iterative algorithm for image deblurring and denoising problems," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 617-626, 2014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.07.004

I. J. Goodfellow et al., "Generative Adversarial Nets," in Proc. of International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661

D. E. Rumelhart, "Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors," Nature, vol. 323, pp. 533-536, 1986. Available from: https://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~vincentp/ift3395/lectures/backprop_old.pdf

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114

H. Li and S. Misra, "Prediction of Subsurface NMR T2 Distributions in a Shale Petroleum System Using Variational Autoencoder-Based Neural Networks," IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 23995-2397, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2766130

M. Lopez-Martin, B. Carro, A. Sanchez-Esguevillas, and J. Lioret, "Conditional variational autoencoder for prediction and feature recovery applied to intrusion detection in IoT," Sensors, vol. 17, no. 9, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091967

D. M. Blei, A. Kucukelbir, and J. D. McAuliffe, "Variational inference: A review for statisticians," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 112, no. 518, pp. 859-877, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.00670

K. Zhu, "Bootstrapping the portmanteau tests in weak auto-regressive moving average models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 463-485, 2016. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24775347

H. Akaike, "Fitting autoregressive models for prediction," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 243-247, 1969. Available from: https://www.ism.ac.jp/editsec/aism/pdf/021_2_0243.pdf

A. Oord, N. Kalchbrenner, and K. Kavukcuoglu, "Pixel recurrent neural networks," in Proc. of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 48, pp. 1747-1756, 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.06759

L. Mou, P. Ghamisi, and X. Zhu, "Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 3639-3655, July 2017. Available from: https://elib.dlr.de/114208/1/07914752.pdf

K. Gregor et al., "DRAW: A Recurrent Neural Network for Image Generation," Computer Science, vol. 37, pp. 1462-1471, 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1502.04623

A. Oord et al., "Conditional image generation with pixelcnn decoders," Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 4797-4805, 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.05328

T. Salimans, A. Karpathy, X. Chen, and D. P. Kingma, "Pixelcnn++: Improving the pixelcnn with discretized logistic mixture likelihood and other modifications," arXiv preprint arXiv: 1701.05517, 2017. Available from: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=BJrFC6ceg

C. Nash et al., "PolyGen: An autoregressive generative model of 3D meshes," arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10880, Feb. 2020. Available from: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/nash20a/nash20a.pdf

Z. Bahroun et al., "Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 12983, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983

V. Ratten and P. Jones, "Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT): Implications for management educators," The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 100857, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100857

T. Sakirin and S. Kusuma, "A Survey of Generative Artificial Intelligence Techniques," Babylonian Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2023, pp. 10–14, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.02781

R. T. Hughes, L. Zhu, and T. Bednarz, "Generative adversarial networks–enabled human–artificial intelligence collaborative applications for creative and design industries: A systematic review of current approaches and trends," Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 604234, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.604234

Downloads

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

[1]
M. Shukla, I. Goyal, B. Gupta, and J. Sharma, “A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity”, IJIRCST, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 10–15, Jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.